Good morning to everyone who reads this blog… This time
we’ll start with a real test of Mo2
Maneuver and see what this it is worth for, therefore let us simply follow on the new patient prepared for the next week All-On-4®
procedure.
The clinician (Leif.Löberg DDS) has prescribed “All-On-4® protocol following
Mo2 Maneuver” which
is very concise way to prescribe for the implant laboratory on what is needed… will capture the outcome seconds after & share with you...
Please remember that surgical & prosthetic methodology called shortly Mo2 Maneuver
and applied within any Immediate Loading protocol for the patients with
terminal dentition is indeed designed
for a solo practitioner(s) and his/her temporarily conjured restorative team in
mind rather that teams within a large chains of restorative centers focused
on this modality…
The clinician(s) who are
performing All-On-4® procedure on any particular patient with terminal
dentition and by following Mo2 Maneuver will receive three (3) small essential items that
will represent the entire key to the
road map to follow.
As per
current technological situation, the value of DICOM CT-scan data and
advances of current computerized guided dentistry is unfortunately not
applicable for the typical immediately loaded All-On-4® procedures since the preexistence
of terminal dentition, which will be removed first on the time of
surgery hence not justifying for any functional computerized guide stent being
pre-made.
Therefore
there approximately are four (4) main reasons that could cause failure of the
entire All-On-4® or any Immediate Loading procedures and they can interject
either as a standalone or as a combined interference reasons. They are:
- Bone remodeling i.e bone height
optimization is not sufficient and do not correlate stone planning model
anticipation, thus even if the implant position is great, mechanically failed
prosthetic is to expect due to the lack of vertical space and compromising with
the overall dimension requirements.
- The implant position and its
trajectory is impeding against achieving good esthetics so even if the interim
prosthetics were great in the planning phase, the final outcome will be
unsatisfactory.
- The trajectory of the prosthetic Multi-Unit
abutment is chosen poorly hence even if the 3D implant placement is adequate
the overall esthetic appearance of the interim prosthesis will be
compromised.
- The prosthetic lab work does not
correlate with the newly achieved intra-oral conditions thus even if bone
optimization as well as the implants & abutment position are highly
satisfactory it will result into uncontrollable chain of faults with a
wide-open occlusion, no fundamental functionality nor basic esthetics obtained.
Contending
all these factors in one single visit is delicate not to say complex,
especially for a temporarily conjured restorative teams performing particular All-On-4® procedure, thus much higher satisfactory rate of the clinicians
belonging to well trimmed teams of the large clinical chains.
Instead of contending all these factors as in case of the
teams in a large clinical centers can do, the Mo2
Maneuver is a methodology based on
“Checks & Balances” to be followed that is self-contending.
…Avoidance of
undetected error introduction into the restorative protocol commensurate with
overall success and well-being of the patient as well as how
comfortable the entire restorative team is in conducting "one-visit" immediate
loading procedures in the long run…
P.S. Eventually, I will
try to capture the very immediate post-op outcome (seconds after) and sincerely
share the result with you! This should provide another dimension for you, almost
being on a Hands-On course on your own and HOPE YOU WILL ENJOY IT !
Thank you,